Back to Calculator

Our Methodology

Understand how we evaluate benefits programs and generate actionable insights for your organization.

What Is ScoreMyBenefits?

The ScoreMyBenefits score is a comparative assessment that evaluates your benefits program against normalized industry benchmarks and aggregated market data, designed to support decision-making—it is not an actuarial valuation, financial guarantee, or prediction of future outcomes.

Our benchmarks are derived from aggregated public data sources, including government filings, industry surveys, and normalized market ranges, compiled and updated to reflect current benefits market conditions.

How We Evaluate Your Benefits Program
A multi-dimensional approach to benefits analysis

ScoreMyBenefits evaluates your benefits program across multiple dimensions and compares your program to aggregated benchmarks for similar organizations. The process is designed to identify where your program aligns with or differs from market norms.

Cost Positioning (30%)

We compare your premium rates, deductibles, and employee cost-sharing against normalized ranges for your industry and company size. Programs with competitive cost structures relative to coverage receive higher scores.

Coverage Design (25%)

We assess whether your plan includes standard and enhanced coverage features commonly offered by organizations in your market segment, including preventive care access, prescription benefits, and care delivery models.

Wellness and Support Programs (25%)

We evaluate the presence and breadth of wellness initiatives, health management programs, and employee support services that research shows contribute to program effectiveness and employee satisfaction.

Program Administration (20%)

We consider funding approaches, pharmacy benefit structures, cost containment strategies, and administrative features that influence program efficiency and employee experience.

How Comparison Works

Your program data is normalized and mapped to aggregated benchmark ranges derived from public sources, industry surveys, and government filings. We identify where your program falls within observed market distributions—whether below, within, or above typical ranges for organizations similar to yours.

Understanding Your Score

What the Score Means

Scores reflect comparative positioning, not absolute quality. A higher score indicates closer alignment with or exceeding market benchmarks across evaluated dimensions. A lower score suggests opportunities to evaluate whether your program's design, cost structure, or feature set differs from market norms in ways you may want to address.

Letter Grade Thresholds

A
≥85
B
72-84
C
60-71
D
50-59
F
<50

What the Score Does Not Mean

The score is not a quality rating, actuarial assessment, or guarantee of program performance. It does not predict employee satisfaction, utilization patterns, future costs, or savings outcomes. It is a comparative snapshot designed to support evaluation and discussion with your benefits advisors.

Five-Year Cost Projections

This is a modeled projection based on stated assumptions and current program data. Actual costs will vary based on utilization, carrier changes, market conditions, and plan design modifications.

Key Assumption:

Our projections use a 4.5% annual medical trend rate based on current industry forecasts from sources including Kaiser Family Foundation and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Confidence Levels
How we indicate data quality and completeness

High Confidence

Complete program data was provided, including verified premium rates, plan design details, and participation information. The assessment is based on comprehensive inputs aligned with your stated industry and company size.

Medium Confidence

Most program details were provided, but some information was estimated or derived from industry ranges. The assessment reflects available data and may be refined with additional program details.

Low Confidence

Limited program information was available, requiring significant reliance on industry averages and normalized assumptions. This assessment provides directional guidance but should be considered preliminary until more complete data is provided.

Benchmark Data Sources

Our benchmarks are compiled from multiple authoritative sources, including:

  • Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) - Employer Health Benefits Annual Survey
  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) - National Health Expenditure Projections
  • Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) - Health Care Benefits Reports
  • America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) - Market Surveys
  • U.S. Department of Labor - Form 5500 filings (public database)

Benchmarks are reviewed and updated regularly to reflect current market conditions and regulatory changes.

Structural Rating System
Understanding plan sustainability and risk assessment

Benchmark Engine vs Structural Engine

Our analysis uses two complementary engines. The Benchmark Engine compares your plan against industry standards for cost, coverage, and program features. The Structural Engineevaluates the underlying health and sustainability of your plan structure, identifying systemic risks and opportunities that go beyond point-in-time comparisons.

Cost Distortion Index (CDI)

The CDI measures how much your plan's cost structure deviates from expected benchmarks. A lower CDI (closer to 0) indicates better alignment with industry norms, while higher values suggest areas where costs may be inflated or misallocated. CDI is computed deterministically from cost stack components and premium breakdowns.

Structural Rating (AAA to D)

The Structural Rating provides a letter-grade assessment of plan sustainability. AAA represents exceptional structural health with optimized cost allocation, while D indicates distressed conditions requiring immediate attention. The rating is derived from structural scores, CDI, and plan characteristics.

Sustainability Outlook

The outlook indicates the expected trajectory of your plan:
POSITIVE: Plan shows signs of improving efficiency
STABLE: Current structure is sustainable
NEGATIVE: Structural concerns may lead to cost escalation

Confidence Band

Indicates data completeness and reliability of the assessment:
HIGH: Complete data including premium, cost stack, CDI, and health metrics
MEDIUM: Key data available with some estimates
LOW: Limited data requiring significant assumptions

Rating Scale Reference

AAA
≥92
AA
88-91
A
84-87
BBB
78-83
BB
72-77
B
66-71
CCC
58-65
CC
50-57
C
40-49
D
<40
Model Versions
Current engine and methodology versions
Savings Engine
v2026.02.28
Renewal Decomposition
renewal-decomp-v1
SIMR Rating
simr-v1

Model versions are included in all outputs for audit traceability. Version changes are documented and may affect scores and projections.

Important Note

ScoreMyBenefits is a decision-support tool designed to help you evaluate and compare your benefits program against market benchmarks. It is not a substitute for actuarial analysis, legal counsel, or licensed underwriting services.

The scores, projections, and recommendations provided are based on aggregated data and modeled scenarios—they reflect comparative positioning, not guaranteed outcomes. Your actual costs, savings, and program performance will vary based on plan design, carrier contracts, employee demographics, utilization patterns, and market conditions.

We recommend consulting with qualified benefits advisors, actuaries, and legal professionals before making benefits decisions. ScoreMyBenefits does not provide actuarial, legal, tax, or underwriting advice.

Disclaimer: This is a decision support model. Outputs are deterministic given inputs.